for your retinal pleasure
February 01, 2003
nice camera work tony
posted by: Byron Bay @ February 3, 2003 12:02 PM
thanks :) i think buying that extra 128MB compactFlash card came in handy for New Years Eve
posted by: tony @ February 4, 2003 11:55 AM
posted by: Byron Bay @ February 5, 2003 02:56 PM
youre a sneaky photographer!
posted by: helen @ February 5, 2003 03:23 PM
tony...you are a slime.whats your girlfriend think of your sleazy camera work?
posted by: kitty @ February 6, 2003 10:43 PM
she was the first to see the photos.. don't be shy now kitty, what's your real name??
posted by: tony @ February 6, 2003 10:52 PM
No appreciation for quality. There's just as many semi-naked guys on camera, so no one should be complaining. Great work babe!
posted by: Kazz @ February 7, 2003 10:11 AM
TOP SHELF : Tasteful yet daring .. very high quality pictures with a classy element of photographic diary work also in the mix. Your eye for farming, excellent use of colours and capture of mood is simply outstanding. It seems there is someone out there though TONY who seeks to cry foul - when trying to interpret your most smooth + impressive work to date.
A guide for ms Kitty : as her frontal lobes aren’t fully developed yet (English and thoughts demonstrate the insight and maturity of a 15 yr old) ; the difference between sleazy shots and high brow, tasteful output is the same as the difference between a copy of RALPH and a copy of PICTURE MAGIZINE. Remember TONY it takes a very narrow minded, uninformed person with absolutely no idea or appreciation for what your accomplishing here to make such a unsubstantiated and ridiculous statement.
posted by: Cheech-san-fu @ February 7, 2003 02:52 PM
First, Apologies TONY ; I don’t wish to make your site the whipping board for such an uneducated and unquestionably stupid person. Although something really needs to be said. Kitty is an obvious cover for an hideously overweight teenager – who by way of not exercising the maturity needed to just walk away – showed us all the following things
A) She’s a nasty envious Bridge Troll who’s never seen a shaven pair of legs before or a BRA that doesn’t have a max carrying capacity of 100KG
B) She has no idea who your site caters for – which is not for NUNS from the Vatican through way of shitty mouse control – end up at various unknown URLs.
C) She needs to feel the weight of her opinion actually counts for something (and a heavy one it must be) ; by forcing her petty – ‘FAT UNSIGHTLY CHIX’ views onto the many visitors your site has retained and who take the time to praise you for your top ranking website – which is obviously a labour of love.
Never be swayed by these people TONY - fortunately they are fewer than those of us who don’t wear underpants that could black out the sun. Remember your many return supporters with fully developed frontal lobes – who simply “love your work !”.
PS : This is not the Jerry Springer show : so please, NO Reponses Ms Kitty. It’s the HAND for you.
posted by: Cheech-san-Fu @ February 7, 2003 02:55 PM
Hey? Wheres the Chick Pics?
posted by: Brian @ February 8, 2003 03:46 PM
i was looking at your picture and i have seen this girl with this t shirt with write on "have you seen salt and pepper". i was in Byron Bay with a italian friend of mine,i am italian to anyway,last year in january and we were called salt and pepper as nickname. do you know this girl? are they friend of u? becouse is incredible for me. i dont know them that the thing......anyway if some one have some information will be nice get in contact.........
Anyway sorry 4 my spelling mistake
posted by: thomas @ January 22, 2004 04:08 AM